problems of onomasticsの例文
- IC is certainly notable because the editorial boards of 10, 409 journals actually have gone through their submission process, reliable meaning there seems to be no reason to think they are academically dubious or dishonest-they list their methods clearly-and I think it's a stretch to think they would be unreliable if 10, 409 journals are laying their credibility on the line by actively requesting inclusion and ICV evaluation, and independent in that they have designed their review and scoring methodology independent of " Problems of Onomastics " . ( It looks like a few journals might be gaming the scoring though.
